Ignite presentation learner response

Callum tabloid coverage of EU referendum.

-Excellent clear opening that outlines the topic, issues and background.

-Political background and press is described clearly-good communication and important context.

-Too much text on slides and presentation is increasingly reading this text to us. Very disappointing as the images selected are very good. Reading the text also means the presentation is rushed- hard to keep track of so much information.

-There clearly is very good research here but its too much to keep up with-as an audience it is
overwhelming.

-There are very interesting issues and debates that are suggested here- the final slide or two raises vital questions-but i'd rather have seen discussion and opinion of these during the presentation rather than reading off the slides.

- Presentation was so rushed it became difficult to judge whether staying focused on issue.

-Q&A- question on bias is good fit slightly difficult to follow, but really well handled with an excellent well thought out opinion. Knowledge of the political background impressive.

- Excellent Q on the influence of the internet on the debate...and the answer is thoughtful. q&a has been very impressive- should be more confident in own opinions+presentation skills for the main ignite part!

CONTENT-5
CLARITY-4
PRESENTATION -2
=11

WWW- I believe my research was done quite well and I had a lot of information and tried to incorporate this into my presentation. My presentations Q&A went well but should have had more of my own opinions in my presentations.

EBI- I could've condensed my information to make a better presentation with more rehearsal. Also i couldve expanded my research into something to compare the tabloids to.

From the presentation i am confident with sticking to the same question but changing it slightly to newspapers pre and post referendum as there would be more to talk about and compare making for an interesting critical investigation.